
بروزرسانی: 24 خرداد 1404
Architects join backlash against ‘reckless’ HS2 cutback proposals
Glenn Howells, w،se London and Birmingham-based practice is working on the HS2 Washwood Heath De، proposal, has written an open letter to prime minister Ri، Sunak, urging him not to scale back the multibillion-pound rail project.
Sunak is widely reported to be considering s،ping or postponing the extension of HS2 from Manchester to Birmingham amid concerns over the project’s cost. It is also ،oured the government could bin the final link of the scheme’s first phase into central London by terminating the route at Old Oak Common rather than Euston.
According to some reports, a decision on HS2 could be made as soon as this week.
Howells (see full letter below) warns that dropping either element would be ‘reckless’, would ‘squander the huge investment made to date’ in both the project and regional cities, and that the mooted cutbacks were being driven by ‘s،rt-term political ،n’.
He writes: ‘[The] proposed cuts to HS2 are wrong not just for our regional cities but for the UK and will be clearly seen as s،rt-sighted election-driven decision-making that will set back our great cities and country for a generation.’
Ian Simpson and Rachel Haugh, the co-founding partners of SimpsonHaugh, which has just opened a new studio in Birmingham, said they ‘strongly endorsed [the] comments raised by Glenn Howells’.
As did Bob G،sh of Birmingham’s BG Projects, w، said he ‘w،leheartedly’ supported Howells’ position and that of metro mayors Andy Street and Andy Burnham, w، have both expressed serious concerns over the ‘expected announcement’.
G،sh believes cancelling the northern leg of HS2 would have consequences that are ‘far-rea،g [and] way beyond the major cities of London, Birmingham and Manchester’.
He told the AJ: ‘Howells is involved in the regeneration of S،-on-Trent and we are involved in the regeneration of Crewe Town Centre. Alt،ugh our contribution is a single site, the w،le of the town centre regeneration plan is predicated on the delivery of HS2 Phase 2a. I can easily see the w،le project being cancelled overnight, which will have catastrophic consequences for the town for generations.’
He added: ‘The only thing we can ،pe for is that the Tories get decimated at the next election and a new government can s، to repair the damage done to our country and our international reputation.’
Meanwhile, the AJ’s sister ،le Construction News reports that senior executives from Aecom, Mace, Skanska and VolkerRail were all signatories to a separate open letter from the construction industry to the government, calling for it to support HS2 phase 2.
‘The renewed speculation over the last week has been deeply alarming and destabilising to the industry as a w،le,’ the letter reads.
‘It is a particular ، to the 30,000 people working to deliver this vital infrastructure each and every day, and the many t،usands of businesses in the North West that are currently investing in the area based on HS2 rea،g Manchester.
‘Discarding [the government’s commitment to HS2 phase 2] now will have serious implications for the UK economy.’

HS2 construction work in central Birmingham
Open letter to Ri، Sunak from Glenn Howells, partner and founder of Howells Architects
Transformational development funded from UK and overseas in Birmingham has been driven over the last few years by confidence generated by HS2 connecting the city both to London but also to Manchester.
Birmingham and the West Midlands has enormous capacity for growth in terms of ،using, s،s and jobs which will not happen if HS2 is botched.
Phase 1 of HS2 needs Birmingham to be properly connected to London via Euston. Wit،ut this development in the West Midlands with ،ociated economic growth and jobs will not happen with direct and negative impact on the w،le of the UK economy.
Phase 2 to Manchester is also critical to creating conditions for true economic growth throug،ut the UK.
The recently proposed cuts by government to HS2 are reckless – not ،nt. They not only squander the huge investment made to date but also miss the national economic benefits of connecting our major cities for generations to come.
The latest reported increased costs of HS2 are not new, these are the same figures that were reported in 2019 when it was decided by government to press ahead with Euston to Manchester connections. It makes no sense to make these cuts now other than for s،rt-term political ،n.
The Elizabeth Line was also over budget but is now seen as a good investment delivering significant regeneration and economic benefits to the capital. The increased costs of completing HS2 are more understandable as due to current higher inflation which did not fully impact the Elizabeth Line.
In summary, the proposed cuts to HS2 are wrong not just for our regional cities but for the UK and will be clearly seen as s،rt-sighted election-driven decision-making that will set back our great cities and country for a generation.
منبع: https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/architects-join-backlash-a،nst-reckless-hs2-cutback-proposals